<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.sci.utah.edu/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<language>en-us</language>
<description>SCI Institute Seminar Series, Distinguished Lecture Series and public events.</description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:37:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<title>SCI Institute Upcoming Events</title>
<link>http://www.sci.utah.edu/events.html</link>
<item>
	<title>May 29, 2012 12:05pm - Imaging Seminar:  Paul Yushkevich presents - Label Fusion Strategies for Multi-Atlas Segmentation and Groupwise Correspondence in Medical Imaging</title>
	<link>http://www.sci.utah.edu/events/showevent.html?id=653</link>
	<guid>http://www.sci.utah.edu/events/showevent.html?id=653</guid>
	<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.sci.utah.edu/images/http://picsl.upenn.edu/wiki/uploads/People/myface.png&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;Paul Yushkevich&quot; &gt;
&lt;p&gt;Evans Visualization Center, WEB 3780&lt;br /&gt;Warnock Engineering Building, 3rd floor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;p&gt;Abstract from a closely related work published on IPMI 2011:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&Acirc;&nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Optimal Weights for Multi-Atlas Label Fusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Multi-atlas based segmentation has been applied widely in medical image analysis. For label fusion, previous studies show that image similarity-based local weighting techniques produce the most accurate results. However, these methods ignore the correlations between results produced by di&iuml;&not;erent atlases. Furthermore, they rely on preselected weighting models and ad hoc methods to choose model parameters. We propose a novel label fusion method to address these limitations. Our formulation directly aims at reducing the expectation of the combined error and can be e&iuml;&not;ciently solved in a closed form. In our hippocampus segmentation experiment, our method signi&iuml;&not;cantly outperforms similarity-based local weighting. Using 20 atlases, we produce results with 0.898 &Acirc;&plusmn; 0.019 Dice overlap to manual labelings for controls.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&Acirc;&nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

